About

Why we built ConfirmMyMeds.

Hi, Dr. Wang here with ConfirmMyMeds. I’m an internist working in the ambulatory setting. I created this application and portal to solve the issue of medication inaccuracy. Medication list in the electronic health record is often incorrect, and patients find it difficult to report medication outside your clinic. Clinicians function in busy workflows, medication inaccuracies with dangerous interactions can lead to patient safety breach. So check this application out, reach out to me by booking a demo. I look forward to seeing your clinic’s workflow and how this application may help.

ConfirmMyMeds is a working application. It works, and it has no outcome data behind it. We’re not going to tell you it saves eleven minutes a visit or reduces errors by a third. We haven’t measured that. What we have is a design built from published evidence about what’s broken (see Evidence), and three questions only practicing clinicians can answer:

Where would this have to appear in your workflow for you to actually use it?
What would you need to see before you’d stop re-asking the whole list?
Who in your practice should read a flagged medication change, and how quickly?

When we have outcome data, we’ll publish it — including the parts that don’t flatter us.

On compliance

We’re not selling compliance

CMS MIPS Measure #130 asks for best-effort documentation of a current medication list, and you’re likely already meeting it. We’re not selling compliance. We’re trying to make the list you’re already documenting worth trusting — to you, and to the four other providers who are working from their own version of it.

The working application

What’s built vs. what’s simulated

What we walk you through in a live demo is a real, running application implementing the core workflow — clinician worklist, patient attestation, discrepancy review, and a tamper-evident audit log. Real EHR integration, login security, message delivery, and production HIPAA infrastructure are simulated in the UI rather than backed by real infrastructure. Book a Free Demo →

Security & data handling

What we hold, what we don’t, and what we can’t do.

Read-only, by design

We never write to your EHR. Read-only access via standardized APIs. No write scopes requested.

Business Associate Agreement

With every client practice, and with every subprocessor.

No PHI in notifications

SMS and email contain a neutral message and a single-use link — never medication details.

Single-use, expiring links

Short-lived, single-use links tied to a scheduled appointment.

Immutable attestations

A confirmation is never edited after the fact — the record of what the patient saw and said stays intact.

Full audit trail

Every access and attestation event is logged.

Encrypted, US-resident

Encryption in transit and at rest; US data residency.

The no-write-back design isn’t a limitation — it’s deliberate. Under HIPAA, a patient may request an amendment to their record; the provider decides. We built to match that. Patient-asserted data cannot enter your legal record without a clinician putting it there.

We don’t display an unqualified “HIPAA compliant” badge — that’s not a certification anyone issues, it’s a self-assertion, and security-literate buyers discount it. We’d rather describe the controls above and the BAA than the badge.

Specialties

Built for the lists that are hardest to confirm.

Discrepancy risk rises with the number of medications, the number of prescribers, patient age, the involvement of a specialist, and the patient’s own unfamiliarity with their regimen. These are exactly the patients whose care is most fragmented — and where a confirmed medication list matters most.

Nephrology

225 ambulatory reconciliations across 115 advanced-CKD patients identified 180 discrepancies. Nearly a quarter faced potential moderate discomfort or clinical deterioration. Source →

Cardiology and heart failure

Cardiovascular medications are repeatedly among those most involved in unintentional discrepancies, in a population where polypharmacy is the standard of care and where fragmentation of care has been directly linked to reduced trust and poorer medication adherence. Source → · Source →

Also relevant

Internal medicine, family medicine, endocrinology, pulmonology, gastroenterology, rheumatology, infectious disease — anywhere long lists meet short visits and multiple prescribers meet a single patient.

We don’t add statistics for specialties beyond nephrology and cardiology — no comparable ambulatory data has been located yet.

The patients who most need this are often the least comfortable with a phone-based flow. We designed for caregivers as first-class users and we measure completion separately for geriatric and polypharmacy panels, because we’d rather know that number than average it away.

Design partner

Thirty minutes, and permission to be blunt.

We’re looking for a small number of clinics to use the working application and tell us where it fails. Evaluating the working application is free — no cost, no BAA needed, because no real patient data is involved; no EHR integration to get started, either — upload a medication list file and your team can start this week. Running it against real patient data is different: that requires a BAA and a paid plan (see Pricing), because we don’t take on real PHI for free. Join as a design partner and today’s tier pricing is locked in for as long as you stay a customer, even if list price rises later for new customers.

What we’ll show you

The working application, end to end — what your staff sees and what your patients see.

What we’ll ask you

Where it would have to live in your workflow, what would make you trust it, and who would own reading the flags.

What we will do

Work with your clinic to determine the best workflow to optimize medication review.

Tell us about your practice

Common questions

“Shouldn’t the pharmacy be doing this?”

They’d be well placed to, and structurally they can’t. Nearly half of patients use multiple pharmacies, and each pharmacy’s view is siloed to its own fills. Community pharmacists in transitions of care are constrained by lack of EMR access and inadequate reimbursement. Where pharmacist-led reconciliation happens properly, it runs 15–30 minutes per patient. This isn’t a gap the pharmacy is declining to fill; it’s one no single dispensing location can see across.

“Will patients actually complete it?”

We don’t know our number yet — it’s the first thing we’ll measure with you. The best available benchmark: OurDX, a pre-visit tool, was completed in 65% of eligible adult primary care visits. Different tool, different purpose, portal-dependent — we cite it as the closest signal, not a prediction.

“Patients don’t know their medications.”

Some don’t. But they’re already your source — you ask them verbally at every visit. At home they have the bottles, the pill organizer, and unhurried time. We’re changing the conditions, not the source.

“Isn’t patient-reported data unreliable?”

The reliability concerns in the literature are largely about wearable sensors, where clinicians reasonably ask how the device measured something. A medication attestation is the same question you’d ask out loud — this person, this question, this timestamp.

“Won’t this become another inbox?”

That’s the failure mode we worry about most. We show the delta, not the list. If a patient confirms all fourteen medications, there’s nothing for you to open.

“What if a patient reports something urgent?”

Requests are bound to a scheduled appointment window and expire. High-risk classes are flagged distinctly. Patients are told plainly — with your phone number — that this isn’t a way to reach your team urgently. We agree on who reviews flags and within what window before going live.

“How much does this cost?”

See Pricing for current, illustrative tiers, priced per clinic based on patient panel size, not clinician headcount. We say “illustrative” deliberately: the numbers are real, but we’re an early-stage company and expect to refine them as our first deployments teach us more. If you join as a design partner while we’re still learning, we lock in whatever you signed up under for as long as you stay a customer.

“Do we have to change our EHR workflow?”

No. We read from your EHR and hand back a reviewable summary. We never write, so nothing in your charting changes without your clinician doing it.

“What about patients who don’t complete it?”

They’re roomed exactly as today. A patient who doesn’t respond costs you nothing beyond your current process.

“My patients see multiple specialists — will they all see the same confirmed list?”

That’s the goal. When a patient confirms their medications before your visit, that confirmation — timestamped and attributed — is available to your practice. If their other providers also use ConfirmMyMeds, every clinician starts from the same patient-confirmed foundation. If they don’t, the patient still has a more accurate list to bring to every visit.